Ulrike Kapp-Popov

T  +43 (0) 699 1997 16 16

E  e-learning@ueg.eu


Elisabeth Sailer

T  +43 699 1997 16 20



Ruby Sutton

T  +43 699 1997 16 18



Standards and guidelines for your daily practice 

Get guidance through our new central repository of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines including recommendations, position papers, and standard protocols.

Take a course and get CME credits

Several UEG courses organised by UEG, are accredited by EACCME to award European CME credits.

A case at the crossroads of dermatology and gastroenterology

What next for a middle-aged patient with a condition affecting her skin and mouth? 

Several years ago, a middle-aged woman presented with a condition affecting her skin (photograph A) and mouth (photograph B), and she was diagnosed with lichen planus.

The patient then presented with dysphagia. A lesion was found high in the oesophagus (photograph C) and biopsy samples were taken (photograph D). Case question 1 WHAT IS THE AETIOLOGY OF THE STRICTURE? a) Benign b) Malignant 

Enhance your knowledge with the UEG Library!

Find new educational online content from UEG Week 2017 subtitled into Spanish.

Apply for the UEG Activity Grant until April 13, 2018!

Get endorsement for your educational project in the field of digestive health.

Please sign-in and access the BORN module to begin interactive web-based training for endoscopists in the detection and delineation of Barrett´s Oesophagus Related Neoplasia now.

Over the last decade this training module has been developed and validated by members of the International Working Group for the Classification of Oesophagitis.
Find out more




ESGAR/EPC Multidisciplinary pancreatic workshop

This course provides knowledge on diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic diseases.

Mistakes in paediatric IBD and how to avoid them

Better clinical outcomes are increasingly being sought in young people with IBD

Around 1 in 10 cases of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) will present before adulthood, with the median age at presentation being 11–12 years.1 IBD in children and young people is associated with more extensive disease, increased disease activity and a higher rate of complications compared with adult-onset IBD.2 Worldwide, estimates of paediatric IBD prevalence rates are lacking, but data suggest its incidence is increasing.3

Risk factors for paediatric IBD include immigration to high prevalence regions, particularly to countries that have Westernised diets, increasing geographical latitude, and European ancestry (versus belonging to an indigenous population).4 The risk may also be higher in children of certain ethnicities (South Asian, Hispanic, and East Asian).5

While the pathophysiology and clinical presentation of paediatric IBD is well understood, the role of genetics and personalised treatment is currently the focus of a significant amount of international research. Better clinical outcomes—including optimal nutrition, improved growth, better quality of life and increased disease remission rates with decreased occurrence of complications—are increasingly being sought in children and young people with IBD.4

This article discusses mistakes commonly made when identifying, diagnosing and managing children whom are suspected or confirmed to have IBD. The mistakes and discussion are based on published evidence where possible, plus our clinical experience of looking after children with IBD.

Prevention of cancer in the gastrointestinal tract and the liver

Learn how to manage patients with pre-neoplastic disorders.

Mistakes in tissue sampling during endoscopy and how to avoid them

Tissue acquisition is the most common manoeuvre performed during endoscopy.

Tissue sampling is the most common manoeuvre performed during endoscopic procedures and histological examination is part of almost every digestive disease investigation. The potential for mistakes is, therefore, widespread and knowledge of the adequacy of the indications and techniques used for tissue sampling during endoscopy, as well as the potential consequences, is indispensable for every gastroenterologist. As such, there are some questions that should always be posed before taking a biopsy sample or tissue acquisition during endoscopy: Why? What for? How? How many? (figure 1). This manuscript has been organized with these questions in mind. We’ve aggregated examples for the eight most frequent and most correctable mistakes made during tissue acquisition by endoscopy. In addition, most of the recommendations made in this article are supported by existing guidelines and evidence, with a few based solely on the authors’ experience. Figure 1 | Questions that should always be asked before a biopsy sample is taken or tissue acquired during endoscopy.

This is the age of liver biomarkers—let the sunshine in!

We are entering a new age of light for noninvasive biomarkers for liver diseases

Much like in the 1969 hit song “The Age of Aquarius”, we are now entering a new age of light when it comes to noninvasive biomarkers for liver diseases. UEG has embraced this new era with an online course that covers current and upcoming biomarkers of steatosis, steatohepatitis, liver fibrosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and biliary diseases. 

In the field of gastroenterology and hepatology, research into noninvasive diagnostics and biomarker discovery has grown exponentially in the past few years. In particular, numerous breakthroughs in the diagnosis of and prediction of prognosis for various acute and chronic liver diseases are now being witnessed. This focus on chronic liver diseases is justified, because they are an increasing source of medical and public health concern worldwide, much of which is due to the lack of early disease biomarkers. A couple of months ago, I had the pleasure of working with Frank Tacke and Jesús Bañales on a new UEG online course “Biomarkers of liver disease”. Our goal was to summarize current diagnostic modalities for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), from simple steatosis to fibrotic and cirrhotic nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), HCC and biliary diseases, discuss their main limitations and introduce novel, prospective biomarkers for disease triggering, staging and monitoring.     Imaging assessment techniques are well established as noninvasive biomarkers, mitigating the need for an invasive liver biopsy. Our UEG online course covers the imaging tools and technologies already employed for diagnosis and monitoring of NAFLD and, particularly, fibrosis, where they may also have potential for the longitudinal assessment of therapeutic responses.1 It should be noted, however, that having tools that allow diagnosis of NAFLD in its earliest stages is of utmost importance, given the high likelihood of progression to more severe stages, including fibrosis itself. In this regard, the possibility of using extracellular vesicles (EVs) and microRNAs (miRNAs) as novel biomarkers of liver disease is particularly appealing, as the EV cargo, which includes miRNAs, represents a snapshot of the parental liver cell at the time of release and changes immediately according to the pathophysiological status of the liver.2,3 Several miRNAs and EV-related proteins present in serum, bile or urine also display high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of different cholangiopathies. These novel biomarkers may, therefore, be of further use for the early detection of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA),4 particularly considering that, at the moment, only nonspecific biochemical (and/or histological) markers are used in combination with clinical and radiological data for the diagnosis of CCA, according to the expert consensus document recently published by the European Network for the Study of Cholangiocarcinoma.5 As for HCC, diagnosis relies mainly on imaging methods. In fact, only ultrasonography is recommended by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) clinical practice guidelines on the management of HCC.6 As such, early HCC diagnosis needs to be improved, as does the ability to identify subgroups of patients who have a different prognosis and response to treatment,7 which could be achieved through EV-based and miRNA-based assays. For instance, specific tumour-associated microparticles (taMPs) have very recently been proposed as novel biomarkers of HCC and CCA.8 As 5 years have passed since the EASL–EORTC guidelines on HCC were published, the next revised version is expected to discuss these and other recent advances in the biomarker field.   As a final note, it should be highlighted that the use of EVs and miRNAs as liver disease biomarkers is not without its challenges. Standardization of sample collection, data normalization and analysis, as well as large, independent comprehensive studies in well-characterized patient populations, are needed to help speed its translation to clinical practice. And this is exactly where the sunshine is finally being let in—several large consortiums supported by the European Commission are now addressing these issues, including EPOS (Elucidating Pathways of Steatohepatitis) [http://www.epos-nafld.eu] and, most recently, LITMUS (Liver Investigation: Testing marker Utility in Steatohepatitis) [http://www.litmus-project.eu]. In particular, the primary aim of LITMUS is to bring new diagnostic tests to NAFLD patients and identify those most at risk of developing severe inflammation and liver scarring, by discovering, validating and qualifying better biomarkers. By closing the gap between patients, researchers and industry, such consortiums will undoubtedly have a key role in firmly establishing EVs and microRNAs as noninvasive biomarkers of liver disease in the clinical setting. I do hope this brief summary and the video shared here will motivate you to have a look and try UEG’s new online course “Biomarkers of liver disease”. As for all UEG online courses, access is free when you sign in to your myUEG account. Enjoy! References
  1. Baues M, Dasgupta A, Ehling J, et al. Fibrosis imaging: Current concepts and future directions. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2017. Epub ahead of print 3 November 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2017.10.013 
  2. Szabo G and Momen-Heravi F. Extracellular vesicles in liver disease and potential as biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 14: 455–466.
  3. Afonso MB, Rodrigues PM, Simão AL and Castro RE. Circulating microRNAs as potential biomarkers in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Med 2016; 5. pii: E30 
  4. Arbelaiz A, Azkargorta M, Krawczyk M, et al. Serum extracellular vesicles contain protein biomarkers for primary sclerosing cholangitis and cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatology 2017; 66: 1125–1143 
  5. Banales JM, Cardinale V, Carpino G, et al. Expert consensus document: Cholangiocarcinoma: current knowledge and future perspectives consensus statement from the European Network for the Study of Cholangiocarcinoma (ENS-CCA). Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 13: 261–280. 
  6. European Association for the Study of the Liver and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2012; 56: 908–943. 
  7. Gerbes A, Zoulim F, Tilg H, et al. Gut roundtable meeting paper: selected recent advances in hepatocellular carcinoma. Gut Pub ahead of print 17 November 2017. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315068. 
  8. Julich-Haertel H, Urban SK, Krawczyk M, et al. Cancer-associated circulating large extracellular vesicles in cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2017; 67: 282–292. 
Homepage image: © CanStockPhoto/etoileark.

Basic and translational research in motility and neurogastroenterology

A course for young PhDs and basic science oriented MDs in the field of GI. It combines state-of-the-art lectures with hands-on lab training.
Apply until March 2, 2018

ESEGH application is open

See the key dates and get ready for the next European Specialty Examination in Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

Summer School in Prague 

This intense, clinically-oriented course is an educational concept for gastroenterology trainees, combining state-of-the-art lectures with practical skills training.
Find out more

Mistakes in managing H. pylori infection and how to avoid them

Careful practice can overcome declining eradication rates for H. pylori treatment.

The sequelae of Helicobacter pylori infection, a known Group 1 carcinogen, can lead to significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Billions of people are infected with H. pylori, but the incidence of H. pylori infection is declining in many parts of Europe, with a study from the Netherlands showing a decline in seroprevalence from 48% in subjects born between 1935 and 1946 to 16% in those born between 1977 and 1987.1

In recent years, however, eradication rates for H. pylori treatment have been falling, which has led to a large number of patients in the community having inadequately managed infections. Most of the problems that have led to the decline in the success of eradication treatment can be easily overcome through careful practice, supported by the robust framework provided by international guidelines. Careful practice includes the correct management of dyspepsia, the appropriate use of diagnostic tests for H. pylori, acceptable, efficacious treatments that enable good patient compliance and adequate follow up to insure eradication has been achieved in all cases. Here, we discuss the mistakes that are made when managing patients infected with H. pylori. Most of the discussion is evidence based, but where evidence is lacking the discussion is based on the authors’ clinical experience of more than 30 years in the field.

Chronic Pancreatitis

Improve your understanding of Chronic Pancreatitis.

One finding and two surprises

A 65-year-old man presents with a microcytic anaemia and a gastric polyp is found. What is your endoscopic diagnosis?

The gastric polyp seen in the video was discovered in a 65-year-old man who presented with a microcytic anaemia. 

Case question 1 WHAT IS YOUR ENDOSCOPIC DIAGNOSIS? a)    Healing gastric ulcer b)    Hyperplastic polyp c)     Gastric inflammatory fibroid polyp d)    Gastric adenoma e)    Gastric cancer
<1 2 3 4 5 6 7>